Rants: Casual nationalization

Posted by J.P. Arendt | Economy, Government, J.P. Arendt, News | Thursday 22 January 2009 10:46 am

What do Venezuela and the USA have in common?  Nationalization, of course.  Over the last month the United States media has fallen into a nationalization frenzy.  Last night I saw a CNBC news story called “Banks of America.”  Today, perusing online news websites I’ve found stories titled “What if Uncle Sam takes over your bank?” (WSJ), “Rescue of banks hints at nationalization” (New York Times), and “Don’t insure the banks – nationalize them” (International Herald Tribune – The Global Edition of the New York Times).  What scares me is the how casually the word “nationalize” is thrown around; as if it is a daily occurrence that we need not worry about; as if it is for our own good.

Hugo Chavez.  That is a lot of people.  Look familiar?
Hugo Chavez. That is a lot of people. Look familiar?

Other countries have nationalized industries as well: USSR, Cuba, China, UK, and most recently Venezuela.  The USSR and UK eventually became largely privatized as a result of the failures of socialism and China is on its way to a freer economy, but Venezuela is the perfect example of nationalization in today’s world.  Hugo Chavez, the President/Dictator or Venezuela, has nationalized virtually every large industry in Venezuela over the span of his rule.  This has led to a lack of incentive for workers, which leads to lousy production.  When a company doesn’t produce it goes out of business, things aren’t so simple for a government.  When a government doesn’t produce goods to sell it produces currency to meet its obligations, which is just what Venezuela is doing.  As a result, Venezuela has been experiencing inflation in the 30% range, which has led to disastrous consequences for its citizens.  This lack of production also inevitably leads to shortages.  In the USSR people averaged waiting in line for two hours per day because of all the shortages and lack of incentives.

In Venezuela nationalization was glorified and welcomed by most of the citizens.  The scary part is that we are beginning to see that in this nation today.  Nationalization has never made anything better in this nation.  Consider the Postal Service.  Have you ever tried waiting in line at a Post Office and dealing with the Postal employees and compared it to doing the same at a UPS Store?  This is only one small example, but it is an important one.  Employees at the Post Office have absolutely no reason to expedite the line beyond leaving work sooner if it is late in the day.  They have set hours, set lunches, set raises, set promotions, and virtually nothing they do will change any of that.  Their only motivation to work is to not get fired.  By contrast, employees of private companies have every motivation to work hard and be seen as a “star.”  They stand to make more money, have better hours, gain more benefits, and simply move up in the world by working hard and better serving their customers.

Don’t be scared into submission by the constant fear mongering that goes on in the media and government.  The government uses fear to get the people to agree to things that they would never otherwise agree to.  It used to be war and now it is socialism.  Nationalization is the exact definition of socialism, and socialism requires a police state to operate and inevitably ends in the bankruptcy of the state and the demise of the people.  Read your history books, my friends.  Socialism never works in the long run.

5 Comments »

  1. Comment by RickC — January 22, 2009 @ 2:49 pm

    When this whole thing started, right as the government began banging the drum for the direness of our situation, and the need for bailouts I knew the game was up. A friend of mine and I were on the phone and he mentioned the need for the bailout because of the credit crunch. I, half jokingly said, “Why don’t we just nationalize everything and get it over with? Are we are free market, capitalist country or not?” Well, everyday I see those questions answered. Very, very sad indeed.

  2. Comment by J.P. Arendt — January 22, 2009 @ 2:53 pm

    It is tragic. Right when Paulson and Bernanke stood up there and announced their bailout plan I knew it was the beginning of the end. It has been a long time coming since the income tax in 1913 then FDR’s New Deal, but it seems like the end game is upon us.

  3. Comment by zhampton21 — January 23, 2009 @ 9:56 am

    Now with the estimates in the $3-4 trillion dollar range in total bail out money, and the talks of one newly configured national bank controlling all of the financial institutions in the US, this thing is spiraling out of control, and quickly. It is sad to see the drastic negative progress this country has made in the hands of the incompetant.

  4. Comment by charleydan — January 23, 2009 @ 7:58 pm

    It frustrates me to no end that even many so called conservatives use these same words freely. Talking of what can government do. Sure a slight different twist but the same. Talking of group responsibility as if it is a duty. I take care of myself just fine, except when I screw up. Need no help with my screw ups either to create them or solve them. It is my learning experience to enjoy.

    What people need to realize about socialism is it changes nothing for status quo, but does change the richness of a country and who is in charge. An article over at Ludwig Von Mises Insitute, puts some light on this. Article entitled, “Inclined to Freedom”.pp 45 refers to a study.

    That of 128 countries of all political persuasions the analysis showed that weather free or socialism there was the same classes in all societies and percentage in each class of society for the five classes in all the different societies. It did not matter how free or lack thereof.

    The Reagan quote: “The boat is rising” is so apt as they found the freer the society the higher all classes lived.

    That seems about right. Because when one becomes a beggar of government, where is the motive, except to beg some more.

    I have hanging in my office a sign. “Failure is only to those that quit” To that I will fight for individual freedom, no matter how cloudy the day gets.

  5. Comment by J.P. Arendt — January 23, 2009 @ 8:31 pm

    “I have hanging in my office a sign. ‘Failure is only to those that quit’ To that I will fight for individual freedom, no matter how cloudy the day gets.”

     

     Amen, Charley.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment